Song Creator Pro is the Google Flow Music alternative that leaves no watermark
Made with Song Creator Pro
Every track below was generated locally on a desktop GPU.
Why switch
3 reasons to choose Song Creator Pro over Google Flow Music
Nothing is stamped into your audio
Google embeds SynthID into everything Flow Music produces. The watermark is inaudible and it is meant for provenance rather than restriction, but it is permanent, it survives normal processing, and it means any track you release can be identified as machine-generated by anyone running a detector. Song Creator Pro writes plain audio files. If you are scoring client work, releasing under your own name, or submitting somewhere with an AI disclosure policy, that difference is the whole decision.
The free tier cannot give you a usable file
Flow Music's free allowance is genuinely generous at 500 daily credits, roughly 15 to 50 songs a day. What it will not do is hand you a high-quality download. That starts at the $8 Starter plan. It is the same shape as every other hosted platform: generous where it costs them nothing, gated at the exact point where the output becomes useful. Song Creator Pro has no separate download step, because the file is already on your machine the moment it renders.
Three names in four years, and counting
This product launched as Riffusion in 2022, became Producer.ai in 2025, was acquired into Google Labs in February 2026 and relaunched as Google Flow Music that April. Each change brought new terms, new pricing and a new model underneath. Udio showed how quickly a platform can withdraw something users assumed was permanent. A locally-installed application cannot be rebranded out from under you, because the copy on your disk keeps working exactly as it did the day you installed it.
Head to head
How Song Creator Pro compares with Google Flow Music
Google Flow Music is the most capable free AI music tool available right now, and saying otherwise would be dishonest. Lyria 3 Pro is excellent, the Gemini-driven conversational editing is genuinely ahead of prompt-and-reroll, and Veo attaches a music video to the result. The comparison below is not about which one generates better audio in a blind test. It is about what is embedded in the file you walk away with, what it costs to keep going, and who controls whether the tool still exists next year.
| Feature | Song Creator Pro | Google Flow Music |
|---|---|---|
| Generation | ||
| Text-to-song | ||
| Custom lyrics | ||
| Section-level prompting | ||
| Remix existing audio | ||
| Conversational editing | Via Gemini | |
| Music video generation | Via Veo | |
| Cover art generation | Via Nano Banana | |
| Stem separation | 4 engines | Not documented |
| Vocal languages | 50+ | Not documented |
| Producer controls | ||
| Seed control for repeatable output | ||
| Guidance scale | ||
| Inference step count | ||
| Choice of separation model | ||
| Generation history with metadata | ||
| What lands in the file | ||
| Watermark embedded in output | SynthID, always | |
| Watermark can be disabled on paid tiers | Not applicable | |
| MP3 export | ||
| WAV export | Not documented | |
| FLAC export | Not documented | |
| Opus and AAC export | Not documented | |
| High-quality download on free tier | ||
| Platform | ||
| Windows desktop app | ||
| Browser access | ||
| Mobile apps | ||
| Runs fully offline | ||
| Audio stays on your device | ||
| Account required | Google account | |
| Regional eligibility restrictions | ||
| Model stored locally | ||
| Limits | ||
| Generations | Unlimited | Credit-metered |
| Free allowance | Full-feature trial | 500 credits daily |
| Songs per month at entry paid tier | Unlimited | ~600 |
| Marginal cost per track | $0 | Per credit |
| Concurrent generations | Limited only by your GPU | Service-limited |
| Cost and licensing | ||
| Pricing model | One-time purchase | Monthly subscription |
| Entry price | $44.99 once | $8/mo |
| Three-year cost at entry tier | $44.99 | $288 |
| Three-year cost at top tier | $44.99 | $2,304 |
| Provider claims ownership of output | ||
| Commercial rights included | Limited | |
| Rights survive cancellation | Limited | |
| Future updates included | While subscribed |
The full list
Top 10 Google Flow Music alternatives of 2026
Every tool below was checked against its current pricing and terms in August 2026. Prices and limits in this category change often, so verify before you commit.
Suno
The most popular AI song generator
Suno is the best known AI music platform and the benchmark most others are measured against. Its v5.5 model produces the most natural vocals of any tool currently available, covering pop, rock, country and R&B convincingly. It runs in the browser, has a large community, and in 2026 added a duration slider and Advanced Split stem separation that regenerates stems rather than extracting them.
Coming from Google Flow Music? The obvious move if you want a comparable model without Google in the middle, though you trade a daily credit allowance for a monthly one and a download cap of 20 songs on Pro.
Pros
- The most natural-sounding vocals of any AI music tool tested in 2026
- Very broad genre coverage and a large, active creator community
- Advanced Split regenerates stems from nearly 100 instrument choices
- Duration control from 10 seconds to 6 minutes in 5-second steps
- Works in any browser on any device, including phones
Cons
- From 3 September 2026 the free tier has no monthly download allowance at all, just a one-off pool of up to 7 trial downloads for personal use
- Paid plans cap downloads: Pro allows only 20 songs a month, Premier 60
- Subscription credits expire and never roll over between days or months
- All audio is processed on Suno's servers, so nothing stays private
- Sony and Universal litigation is ongoing, and current models are due to be retired and replaced with licensed ones
| Plan | Price |
|---|---|
| Free | $0 |
| Pro | $10/mo ($8 annual) |
| Premier | $30/mo ($24 annual) |
Udio
Excellent mixing, but downloads are switched off
Udio built a strong reputation for professional mixing quality and for inpainting, which lets you regenerate specific sections of a track. Then in October 2025 it settled with Universal Music Group and immediately disabled downloading of audio, video and stems for every user. The platform is transitioning into a licensed streaming walled garden where creations stay on Udio.
Coming from Google Flow Music? Strong section editing, but it currently disables downloads altogether, so it fixes none of what sends people looking past Flow Music's paywalled exports.
Pros
- Among the cleanest mixdowns and instrumental separation in the category
- Strong inpainting and section-level editing tools
- Voice Control captures a vocal character and reuses it across generations
- Credit allowances were increased after the UMG deal, with Standard rising to 2,400
Cons
- Downloading audio, video and stems is currently disabled for all users
- The platform is becoming a walled garden where tracks cannot leave Udio
- Subscribers reacted badly enough that legal claims were openly discussed, and Udio had to open a 48-hour emergency download window
- Subscription credits do not roll over between billing cycles
- Cloud-only, so nothing you make is private
| Plan | Price |
|---|---|
| Free | $0 |
| Standard | $10/mo ($8 annual) |
| Pro | $30/mo ($24 annual) |
ElevenLabs Music
The cleanest licensing story in AI music
Eleven Music is ElevenLabs' entry into music generation, launched in August 2025 and substantially upgraded with v2 in 2026. Its distinguishing feature is legal rather than sonic: it was trained on licensed stems and built in partnership with rights holders before launch, rather than settling lawsuits afterwards. It supports vocals in 59 languages and generates section by section with inpainting.
Coming from Google Flow Music? Licensed its training material up front and documents its commercial terms plainly, which is the clearest answer if provenance is what worries you about a watermarked file.
Pros
- Trained on licensed material from the start, giving it the clearest commercial position of any major platform
- Vocals in 59 languages, with native-quality delivery in 11
- Section-by-section building and inpainting to regenerate parts of a track
- Can generate stems, lyrics and full compositions, and shift style mid-track
- A mature, well-documented API for developers
Cons
- Credits are shared with ElevenLabs' speech products, so music competes with your voice usage
- Film, TV and large studio game rights require an Enterprise plan
- Output is capped at 44.1 kHz, and formats are MP3, PCM, Opus and telephony codecs
- Cloud-only with no offline option
- The music product is newer and less battle-tested than its voice tooling
| Plan | Price |
|---|---|
| Free | $0 |
| Starter | $6/mo |
| Creator | $22/mo |
| Pro | $99/mo |
Mureka
Voice cloning and high song throughput
Mureka is a full-stack AI music platform whose V8 model landed in January 2026. Its standout capability is voice cloning: upload a short sample of a voice you have rights to and Mureka will perform new songs in it. Plans are priced by song volume rather than abstract credits, which makes the maths unusually easy, and it bundles stem separation and a lyrics generator.
Coming from Google Flow Music? Priced in songs per month rather than credits, with voice cloning and region editing, and no watermark stamped into the export.
Pros
- Voice cloning for songs, included with commercial rights on paid plans
- Paid plans quoted in songs per month rather than opaque credits
- High volume allowance on paid plans, with 400 songs a month at the entry paid tier
- Stem separation, region and melody editing, and reference audio uploads
- Exports MP3, WAV and MP4
Cons
- Around 10 vocal languages, far fewer than Suno or ElevenLabs
- The free plan is personal use only with standard-quality audio and shorter tracks
- Voice cloning of a real person carries obvious rights risk if you get consent wrong
- Cloud processing, so reference audio you upload leaves your machine
- Smaller community and less third-party tooling than Suno
| Plan | Price |
|---|---|
| Free | $0 |
| Basic | $8/mo (annual) |
| Pro | $24/mo (annual) |
Song Creator Pro
Unlimited local AI music generation and downloads, one time payment
Song Creator Pro is a Windows desktop app that generates, remixes and separates music entirely on your own GPU. There is no account, no upload step and no credit meter. You describe a song in plain language and it renders locally, in any of 50+ languages, with inference steps, guidance scale and seed exposed so results are repeatable. It is a one-time purchase rather than a subscription.
Coming from Google Flow Music? Runs the model on your own GPU, so there is no watermark, no credit meter and no download tier. One payment instead of $8 to $64 a month.
Pros
- Runs 100% offline on your own machine, so prompts and audio never leave your PC
- One-time purchase with lifetime updates instead of a monthly subscription
- Genuinely unlimited generations with no credits, no daily caps and no download limits
- Built-in stem separation
- Producer-grade controls: seed, guidance scale, inference steps and batch generation
- Exports MP3, FLAC, WAV, Opus and AAC with full commercial rights included
Cons
- Windows only today, with macOS still on the roadmap
- An NVIDIA GPU is strongly recommended, and speed depends on your hardware
- No browser or mobile access, so you cannot generate from a phone
- No community feed or social sharing features
| Plan | Price |
|---|---|
| itch.io | $44.99 once |
| Microsoft Store | $49.99 once |
| Bundle | $72.50 once |
MiniMax Music
Cheap per-song generation, aimed at developers
MiniMax Music is a model family from the AI lab MiniMax, with Music 2.5 released in January 2026 and Music 3.0 in July 2026. It is priced per generation rather than by subscription, and credits do not expire, which makes it attractive for occasional use. It is strongest on Mandarin and English, and is positioned more as a developer API than a consumer studio.
Coming from Google Flow Music? The cheapest way off a subscription at roughly $0.15 a song with credits that never expire, though you lose the editing and the music videos entirely.
Pros
- Pay per generation with no subscription, and credits that never expire
- Very cheap at roughly $0.15 a song through the official API
- 14 structural tags give paragraph-level control over song sections
- Selectable sample rates up to 48kHz and bitrates up to 320kbps
- Commercial rights included on all plans
Cons
- No stem export at all, so you only ever get the final mix
- No post-generation editing or section extension
- MP3 only, with no WAV or FLAC output
- Strongest on Mandarin and English, with less reliable pronunciation elsewhere
- Built around an API rather than a polished consumer interface
| Plan | Price |
|---|---|
| Starter | $10 once |
| Pro | $30 once |
| API | $0.15/song |
Stable Audio
Stability AI's audio model, strong on instrumentals
Stable Audio from Stability AI focuses on high-quality instrumental generation, sound design and loops rather than full vocal songs. It is a common pick for producers who want royalty-free beds and textures, and Stable Audio Open gives the research community a downloadable variant.
Coming from Google Flow Music? Instrumental and sound-design focused rather than a song studio, which suits production beds better than Flow Music's vocal-forward output.
Pros
- Excellent instrumental, loop and sound-design output
- Backed by an established research lab, with an open model variant
- Clean royalty-free licensing for paid users
Cons
- Vocals are a weak point compared with Suno or Mureka
- Cloud subscription for the hosted product
- Less suited to writing complete songs with lyrics
| Plan | Price |
|---|---|
| Free | $0 |
| Paid | from $20/mo |
AIVA
Orchestral and cinematic scoring with MIDI export
AIVA specialises in classical, orchestral and cinematic composition. It is the pick for composers who need to take a piece into a DAW and keep working on it, because it exports MIDI rather than only rendered audio, and its top tier assigns you the copyright outright.
Coming from Google Flow Music? Exports MIDI, so the composition stays editable in a DAW instead of arriving as a finished render you cannot take apart.
Pros
- Best-in-class orchestral and cinematic output
- MIDI export, so compositions stay editable in a DAW
- The Pro tier gives you full copyright ownership rather than a licence
Cons
- Essentially no vocal generation
- The Pro tier is expensive at roughly 49 euros a month
- Narrow genre focus compared with general-purpose generators
| Plan | Price |
|---|---|
| Free | $0 |
| Standard | ~15 euros/mo |
| Pro | ~49 euros/mo |
ACE-Step
The open-source model behind much of local AI music
ACE-Step is an open-source music foundation model from ACE Studio and StepFun, and version 1.5 added an FSQ tokenizer along with remix, edit and cover tooling. It is free to download and run locally, and it is the engine underneath a number of consumer local apps, including parts of Song Creator Pro.
Coming from Google Flow Music? The same open-source lineage Flow Music came from, free and local if you are willing to set up Python, CUDA and the model weights yourself.
Pros
- Free and open source, with no licence fee at all
- Runs entirely on your own hardware
- Strong remix, edit and cover capabilities
Cons
- You have to set up Python, CUDA and model weights yourself
- No user interface out of the box beyond community front-ends
- No support, and troubleshooting means reading GitHub issues
- Keeping up with model updates is manual work
| Plan | Price |
|---|---|
| Open source | Free |
Musci.io
One credit pool across seven other engines
Musci.io is best understood as an aggregator rather than a model of its own. A single credit balance buys generations across seven third-party engines including Suno, Udio, ElevenLabs Music, Mureka, MiniMax Music, ACE-Step and Google Lyria 3. It wraps them in one interface and adds side tools such as a vocal remover, song extender and lyrics generator.
Coming from Google Flow Music? Resells seven engines on one credit pool, useful for comparing Lyria against the field before committing to any single platform.
Pros
- Try seven engines without taking out seven separate subscriptions
- Pay-as-you-go credits, so no monthly commitment is required
- Per-generation costs are low, from around $0.04 for a Lyria clip
- Useful extras including vocal remover, song extension and cover generation
- Royalty-free commercial rights on paid plans
Cons
- It does not own a model, so quality, features and availability depend entirely on upstream providers
- Any upstream change, such as Udio disabling downloads, flows straight through to you
- Your audio passes through both Musci.io and the underlying engine
- No deep arrangement control and no enterprise licensing documentation
- WAV export and commercial licensing are gated behind paid plans
| Plan | Price |
|---|---|
| Free | $0 |
| Starter | $9.90/mo |
| Creator | $19.90/mo |
| Studio | $29.90/mo |
Round by round
Song Creator Pro vs Google Flow Music
Six categories, each with a winner.
Free tier
Winner: Google Flow MusicThere is no contest here and it would be silly to pretend otherwise. Five hundred daily credits works out at roughly 15 to 50 songs a day, every day, for nothing, on a state-of-the-art model. No other tool in this comparison gives away that much. If your requirement is to make a lot of music at zero cost and you do not need a high-quality file at the end, Flow Music is simply the right answer and Song Creator Pro's $49.99 is money you do not need to spend.
Editing experience
Winner: Google Flow MusicGemini-driven conversational editing is a real advance over describe-and-reroll. You can talk to the track, ask for a different bridge, push the vocal forward, and iterate in language rather than by rewriting a prompt and regenerating from scratch. Song Creator Pro's repaint and remix tools are more precise and more repeatable, with seed and guidance control, but they are operated rather than conversed with. For a beginner who does not know the vocabulary yet, Flow Music is easier.
Everything around the song
Winner: Google Flow MusicVeo generates a synced music video and Nano Banana produces the cover art, both inside the same session. Song Creator Pro does none of this and has no plans to. If what you actually need is a finished piece of content ready for a social feed rather than an audio file destined for a DAW, Flow Music delivers the whole package and the comparison is not close.
What is embedded in the file
Winner: Song Creator ProEvery Flow Music export carries SynthID, on every tier, with no option to turn it off. It is inaudible and it is not a restriction in any legal sense, but it is a permanent, detectable marker that the track was machine-generated, and it travels with the file wherever it goes. Song Creator Pro renders ordinary audio with nothing embedded. For client work, for releases under your own name, and anywhere an AI-disclosure policy applies, that is a materially different product.
Getting a usable file out
Winner: Song Creator ProFlow Music's free tier does not include high-quality downloads. You can generate 50 songs a day and still not have a release-ready file until you are paying at least $8 a month, and the allowance at that tier is around 600 songs. Song Creator Pro has no download concept at all, because generation writes to a folder on your disk. There is no tier, no counter and no quality ladder between you and the output.
Cost at volume, and over time
Winner: Song Creator ProFlow Music runs $8, $24 or $64 a month. Over three years that is $288 at the bottom and $2,304 at the top, and the meter never stops. Song Creator Pro is $49.99 once, which the Starter tier passes in six months and the Member tier passes in under one. Anyone generating seriously, running ten variations to find a keeper, reaches that crossover fast, and after it every track costs nothing.
Whether the tool still exists next year
Winner: Song Creator ProRiffusion, then Producer.ai, then Google Flow Music, with a Google Labs acquisition in between and three model generations underneath. Google Labs is where products go to be experimented with, and experiments get retired. Udio disabled downloads for paying subscribers overnight after a licensing settlement. Song Creator Pro is a one-time purchase running locally, so the version installed on your machine is unaffected by anyone's corporate strategy.
The verdict
Conclusion
Google Flow Music is the strongest free AI music product available in 2026, and the free tier is not a teaser. Five hundred daily credits, Lyria 3 Pro underneath, conversational editing through Gemini, a Veo music video and Nano Banana cover art in the same session. Google also does not claim ownership of what you generate, which is a better position than several paid competitors hold. For a creator making content for social feeds at no cost, it is difficult to argue against.
The catches are specific and they sit at the end of the process. Every export carries Google's SynthID watermark, on every tier, permanently. High-quality downloads start at $8 a month. It runs only in the cloud, tied to a Google account, with regional eligibility rules. And it is on its third name in four years, now inside Google Labs, where the precedent for long-term stability is not encouraging.
Song Creator Pro is the alternative for the point at which the file matters more than the session. It runs on your own GPU with no account and no internet, writes unwatermarked MP3, FLAC, WAV, Opus and AAC straight to your disk, separates stems with a choice of four engines, and exposes seed, guidance scale and inference steps so a result can be reproduced rather than rediscovered. It costs $49.99 once, roughly six months of Flow Music's cheapest paid tier, and nothing after that.
Frequently Asked Questions
They are the same product under earlier names. Riffusion launched in 2022 as an open-source experiment that generated audio as spectrogram images, rebranded to Producer.ai in 2025, and was acquired by Google into Google Labs in February 2026. Google relaunched it as Google Flow Music in April 2026, running on the Lyria 3 Pro model.
There is a free tier with 500 daily credits, enough for roughly 15 to 50 songs a day depending on complexity, and it requires a Google account rather than a credit card. High-quality downloads are not included on the free tier. Those begin on the Starter plan at $8 a month, with Plus at $24 and Member at $64.
Yes. Every track carries Google's SynthID watermark, which is inaudible but permanent and detectable, and it is applied on all tiers with no option to disable it. Song Creator Pro generates ordinary audio files with no watermark of any kind, because the model runs on your own hardware.
Google states that it does not claim ownership of the original content you generate with Flow Music. That is a more favourable position than several competitors take. Ownership and watermarking are separate questions though: you may own the track and it will still carry SynthID.
Yes. Song Creator Pro runs entirely on your own Windows PC using your GPU, with no internet connection needed after installation and no account at all. ACE-Step and YuE are free open-source models that also run locally, though they require you to configure Python, CUDA and model weights yourself.
On subscription the effective rate depends on how much of the allowance you use: Starter is $8 a month for around 600 songs, Plus $24 for around 2,000, Member $64 for around 6,000. Through the Gemini Developer API, Lyria 3 Pro Preview is priced at about $0.08 per full song and Lyria 3 Clip Preview at about $0.04 per 30-second clip, with no free API tier.
Song Creator Pro is $49.99, which the $8 Starter plan passes in a little over six months, the $24 Plus plan in about two months and the $64 Member plan in under one. After that the local tool costs nothing per track while the subscription keeps charging.
No. Flow Music is a cloud service that runs in the browser or its mobile apps, requires a Google account, and is subject to regional eligibility rules. Song Creator Pro downloads the model once during setup and then generates entirely offline.
Google has not documented stem separation as a Flow Music feature. Song Creator Pro includes four separation engines: ACE-Step for the widest range of instrument types, Demucs 4-stem for vocals, drums, bass and other, a fine-tuned Demucs 4-stem for cleaner versions of those, and Demucs 6-stem which adds guitar and piano. All run locally on any MP3, WAV, FLAC or M4A file.
Lyria 3 Pro, Google's music generation model, which was upgraded to Lyria 3.5 in June 2026 with improvements to vocals, lyrics and creative control. Gemini handles conversational editing, Veo generates matching music videos and Nano Banana produces cover art. Song Creator Pro uses ACE-Step 1.5, an open-source model that runs on your own GPU.
Keep comparing
See how Song Creator Pro compares with other tools
Song Creator Pro is more than just a Google Flow Music alternative
Unlimited local generation, remixing and stem separation on your own GPU. One payment, lifetime updates, and nothing ever leaves your machine.
Get Song Creator ProFree trial on the Microsoft Store · One-time payment · No recurring fees