Song Creator Pro is the AIVA alternative with vocals, no download caps and no subscription
Made with Song Creator Pro
Every track below was generated locally on a desktop GPU.
Why switch
3 reasons to choose Song Creator Pro over AIVA
AIVA cannot write a song with a singer in it
This is the reason most people go looking. AIVA composes: orchestral, cinematic, ambient, electronic, across more than 250 style presets, and it composes well. What it does not do anywhere in the product is generate vocals. There is no lyrics field, no voice model, no vocal stem. If your brief is a track with a verse, a chorus and somebody singing them, AIVA is structurally the wrong tool and no plan upgrade changes that. Song Creator Pro generates full structured songs with synchronised vocals from lyrics you write, in over 50 languages.
The download counter runs out before the month does
AIVA's free tier allows 3 downloads a month, with tracks capped at 3 minutes and a credit line back to AIVA required. Standard, at 11 euros a month billed annually, raises that to 15 downloads and 5 minutes. Fifteen usable exports is a thin month for anyone scoring a game, a channel or a client backlog, and iterating costs you a download every time you want to hear a variation outside the browser. Pro lifts the ceiling to 300, which is generous, but you are paying the top price to escape a limit rather than to unlock a capability. Song Creator Pro has no counter at all: the file renders to your disk and nothing decrements.
Copyright is a feature you rent on the most expensive tier
On both the Free and Standard plans, AIVA's own pricing page states that copyright is owned by AIVA, not by you. Ownership arrives only on Pro, at 33 euros a month billed annually, which is roughly 396 euros a year and about 1,188 euros over three years. AIVA does describe that ownership as permanent for compositions you downloaded while subscribed, which is a real and unusually clear commitment. But the shape of the deal is that the thing you most likely came for sits behind the highest recurring price in this comparison. Song Creator Pro includes a full commercial licence in a one-time $49.99 purchase, with no tier above it.
Head to head
How Song Creator Pro compares with AIVA
AIVA is not a weak product and this page is not going to pretend otherwise. For orchestral and cinematic writing, and for anyone who needs to open the result in a DAW and keep working, it does something none of the prompt-to-audio generators do. The comparison below is about the boundaries of that: what happens when you need vocals, when you need volume, and when you look at what full rights actually cost per year.
| Feature | Song Creator Pro | AIVA |
|---|---|---|
| Generation | ||
| Text-to-song from a plain prompt | Style and influence driven | |
| Custom lyrics | ||
| Vocal generation | ||
| Instrumental-only mode | ||
| Orchestral and cinematic depth | Limited | |
| Remix from your own audio | Influence upload | |
| Stem separation | ||
| Style coverage | Free-form prompts | 250+ presets |
| Vocal languages | 50+ | None |
| Batch generation | ||
| Composition and scoring | ||
| MIDI export | ||
| Take the score into a DAW | ||
| Editable score before rendering | ||
| Note-level editing of a finished file | ||
| Build your own style model | ||
| Upload a MIDI influence | ||
| Upload an audio influence | Remix input | |
| Finished mixed production out of the box | Limited | |
| Producer controls | ||
| Seed control for repeatable output | ||
| Guidance scale | ||
| Inference step count | ||
| Choice of separation model | 4 models | |
| Generation history with metadata | Limited | |
| Output and platform | ||
| MP3 export | ||
| WAV export | Pro plan only | |
| FLAC export | ||
| Windows desktop app | ||
| Browser access | ||
| macOS | On the roadmap | |
| Limits | ||
| Downloads a month | Unlimited | 3 free, 15 Standard, 300 Pro |
| Generations | Unlimited | Plan limited |
| Marginal cost per exported track | $0 | One download off your allowance |
| Maximum track length | Set by the model, not your plan | 3 min free, 5 min Standard, 5 min 30 sec Pro |
| Free tier | Full-feature trial | 3 downloads a month, credit required |
| Concurrent generations | Limited only by your GPU | Plan dependent |
| Privacy and control | ||
| Runs fully offline | ||
| Audio stays on your device | ||
| Account required | ||
| Model stored locally | ||
| Still works if the service goes away | ||
| Cost and licensing | ||
| Pricing model | One-time purchase | Subscription |
| Entry paid price | $49.99 once ($44.99 on itch.io) | 11 euros/mo billed annually |
| Price for unrestricted commercial use | Included | 33 euros/mo billed annually |
| Three-year cost for full rights | $49.99 total | ~1,188 euros |
| Copyright assigned to you | Pro plan only | |
| Commercial licence included | Standard covers 4 social platforms | |
| Attribution required | Free plan only | |
| Future updates included | While subscribed | |
| New exports if you stop paying |
The full list
Top 10 AIVA alternatives of 2026
Every tool below was checked against its current pricing and terms in August 2026. Prices and limits in this category change often, so verify before you commit.
Stable Audio
Stability AI's audio model, strong on instrumentals
Stable Audio from Stability AI focuses on high-quality instrumental generation, sound design and loops rather than full vocal songs. It is a common pick for producers who want royalty-free beds and textures, and Stable Audio Open gives the research community a downloadable variant.
Coming from AIVA? The closest like-for-like swap if you liked AIVA's instrumental focus but wanted more sound design range. It runs its own model, handles cinematic beds and textures well, and like AIVA it is weak on vocals, so do not switch expecting singing.
Pros
- Excellent instrumental, loop and sound-design output
- Backed by an established research lab, with an open model variant
- Clean royalty-free licensing for paid users
Cons
- Vocals are a weak point compared with Suno or Mureka
- Cloud subscription for the hosted product, with no free plan and a $12 a month entry tier
- Less suited to writing complete songs with lyrics
| Plan | Price |
|---|---|
| Solo | $12/mo |
| Session | $30/mo |
| Producer | $90/mo |
| Studio | $199/mo |
Song Creator Pro
Unlimited local AI music generation and downloads, one time payment
Song Creator Pro is a Windows desktop app that generates, remixes and separates music entirely on your own GPU. There is no account, no upload step and no credit meter. It ships two open models, ACE-Step 1.5 and YuE2, and is among the first apps anywhere to run YuE2 on 8 GB GPUs rather than the 24 GB its official release demands. You describe a song in plain language and it renders locally, in any of 50+ languages, with inference steps, guidance scale and seed exposed so results are repeatable. It is a one-time purchase rather than a subscription.
Coming from AIVA? The opposite trade to AIVA: no MIDI export to carry into a DAW, though its YuE2 workflow does let you edit the planned score before rendering. In exchange you get full songs with vocals, unlimited downloads, offline operation and a commercial licence in a single $49.99 payment rather than 33 euros a month.
Pros
- Runs 100% offline on your own machine, so prompts and audio never leave your PC
- Includes YuE2, the model that outscored Suno on WildSongBench, running on 8 GB GPUs
- One-time purchase with lifetime updates instead of a monthly subscription
- Genuinely unlimited generations with no credits, no daily caps and no download limits
- Built-in stem separation
- Producer-grade controls: seed, guidance scale, inference steps and batch generation
- Exports MP3, FLAC and WAV with full commercial rights included
Cons
- Windows only today, with macOS still on the roadmap
- A GPU (NVIDIA or AMD) is strongly recommended, and speed depends on your hardware
- No browser or mobile access, so you cannot generate from a phone
- No community feed or social sharing features
| Plan | Price |
|---|---|
| itch.io | $44.99 once |
| Microsoft Store | $49.99 once |
| Bundle | $72.50 once |
Soundraw
Slider-driven royalty-free beds for video
Soundraw generates royalty-free instrumental music that you shape with genre, mood and energy sliders rather than text prompts. It is purpose-built for video editors who need a track to fit a timeline, and its licence stays valid for content published while subscribed.
Coming from AIVA? For the AIVA user whose actual complaint is the download counter. Soundraw gives unlimited downloads with a commercial licence from around $11 a month, shaped by genre, mood and energy sliders rather than prompts. Instrumental only, and the licence depends on staying subscribed.
Pros
- Fast, predictable results without prompt engineering
- Length and energy controls designed for cutting to video
- Unlimited generation on paid plans
Cons
- Instrumental only, with no real vocal generation
- Less creative range than a prompt-driven model
- No plan allows releasing an unmodified track to streaming services, and WAV and stems are reserved for the Artist tiers
| Plan | Price |
|---|---|
| Free | $0 |
| Creator | ~$11/mo |
| Artist tiers | ~$19.50 to $32.50/mo |
Suno
The most popular AI song generator
Suno is the best known AI music platform and the benchmark most others are measured against. In September 2026 it retired every model before v6 under its Warner settlement and replaced them with the licensed v6 family, which has drawn mixed reviews: cleaner production for some, muffled and more generic output for others. It runs in the browser, has a large community, and offers a duration slider and Advanced Split stem separation that regenerates stems rather than extracting them.
Coming from AIVA? If you left AIVA because you needed a singer, this is the mainstream answer. Be aware of the other side of it: Suno's Pro plan allows 20 downloads a month and Premier 60, so you trade AIVA's cap for a different one, and every pre-v6 model was retired in September 2026.
Pros
- Polished, clean vocal production across mainstream genres
- Very broad genre coverage and a large, active creator community
- Advanced Split regenerates stems from nearly 100 instrument choices
- Duration control from 10 seconds to 6 minutes in 5-second steps
- Works in any browser on any device, including phones
Cons
- From 3 September 2026 the free tier has no monthly download allowance at all, just a one-off pool of up to 7 trial downloads for personal use
- Paid plans cap downloads: Pro allows only 20 songs a month, Premier 60
- Subscription credits expire and never roll over between days or months
- All audio is processed on Suno's servers, so nothing stays private
- Every pre-v6 model was deleted in September 2026, so old songs cannot be extended or regenerated, and Sony and Universal litigation is ongoing
| Plan | Price |
|---|---|
| Free | $0 |
| Pro | $10/mo ($8 annual) |
| Premier | $30/mo ($24 annual) |
ElevenLabs Music
The cleanest licensing story in AI music
Eleven Music is ElevenLabs' entry into music generation, launched in August 2025 and substantially upgraded with v2 in 2026. Its distinguishing feature is legal rather than sonic: it was trained on licensed stems and built in partnership with rights holders before launch, rather than settling lawsuits afterwards. It supports vocals in 59 languages and generates section by section with inpainting.
Coming from AIVA? The pick if AIVA's Pro tier appealed to you specifically because of the rights position. Eleven Music was trained on licensed stems in partnership with rights holders before launch, which is the cleanest provenance story in cloud AI music, and it does vocals in 59 languages.
Pros
- Trained on licensed material from the start, giving it the clearest commercial position of any major platform
- Vocals in 59 languages, with native-quality delivery in 11
- Section-by-section building and inpainting to regenerate parts of a track
- Can generate stems, lyrics and full compositions, and shift style mid-track
- A mature, well-documented API for developers
Cons
- Credits are shared with ElevenLabs' speech products, so music competes with your voice usage
- Film, TV and large studio game rights require an Enterprise plan
- Output is capped at 44.1 kHz, and formats are MP3, PCM, Opus and telephony codecs
- Cloud-only with no offline option
- The music product is newer and less battle-tested than its voice tooling
| Plan | Price |
|---|---|
| Free | $0 |
| Starter | $6/mo ($5 annual) |
| Creator | $22/mo |
| Pro | $99/mo |
Mubert
Royalty-free background music built from human-made samples
Mubert generates royalty-free functional music, the kind that sits behind videos, podcasts, apps and streams, by assembling tracks from a large library of samples contributed by human musicians who get paid when their loops are used. That gives it a cleaner provenance story than models trained by scraping, and it is why Mubert has avoided the lawsuits that reshaped Suno and Udio. You generate by prompt, mood, genre or activity, with tracks up to 25 minutes long, and a developer API serves the same engine to apps and games. As of September 2026 plans run from a free Ambassador tier to a $199 a month Business tier. The catch is scope: it makes background beds, not songs with vocals, and no plan allows publishing to Spotify or other streaming services.
Coming from AIVA? Built from licensed human-made samples rather than scraped audio, with unlimited lossless downloads on every paid plan and tracks up to 25 minutes. Good for the long ambient and background work AIVA is often used for, though no Mubert plan allows releasing to Spotify.
Pros
- Built from licensed human-made samples, so its rights story is unusually clean
- Tracks up to 25 minutes long, well suited to podcasts, streams and ambient beds
- Unlimited lossless and MP3 downloads on every paid plan
- A mature API for generating music inside apps, games and products
- Stem editing on all tiers, with a full track editor for structure, BPM and key on Pro and Business
Cons
- No vocal generation, so it cannot write an actual song with lyrics
- No plan permits releasing tracks to Spotify, Apple Music or any streaming platform, or registering them with Content ID
- Commercial use for monetized content starts at Pro, $39 a month, which adds up fast against a one-time purchase
- The free and Creator tiers are non-commercial only, with the free tier requiring attribution
- Cloud-only, and payments are non-refundable on every tier
| Plan | Price |
|---|---|
| Ambassador | $0 |
| Creator | $14/mo ($11.69 annual) |
| Pro | $39/mo ($32.49 annual) |
| Business | $199/mo ($149.29 annual) |
Beatoven.ai
Mood-driven background music for content
Beatoven.ai composes royalty-free background music built around mood and scene changes, aimed at podcasters, YouTubers and marketers who need a bed that follows the emotional arc of their content rather than a standalone song.
Coming from AIVA? Cheaper than AIVA's Standard plan and aimed at the same job for a lot of AIVA users: mood-driven background scoring that follows the emotional arc of a video or podcast. No vocals, and no MIDI to take into a DAW.
Pros
- Affordable entry pricing with commercial rights
- Scene and mood editing that maps music to a timeline
- Simple enough for non-musicians
Cons
- No vocal generation
- Output is functional background music rather than finished songs
- Higher tiers get expensive quickly
| Plan | Price |
|---|---|
| Free | $0 |
| Creator | $10/mo ($100/yr) |
| Visionary | $20/mo ($200/yr) |
Google Flow Music
Google's AI music studio, formerly Riffusion and Producer.ai
Google Flow Music started life as Riffusion in 2022, a diffusion model that generated audio as spectrogram images, became Producer.ai in 2025, and was acquired into Google Labs in February 2026 before relaunching under its current name that April. It now runs on Lyria 3 Pro, with Gemini handling conversational editing, Veo generating matching music videos and Nano Banana producing cover art. Every track it renders carries Google's SynthID watermark.
Coming from AIVA? Worth trying purely because of the free tier. AIVA gives you 3 downloads a month for free; Flow Music refills free credits every day (Google doesn't publish how many songs they cover). Commercial terms are not stated on its pricing page, and every output carries a SynthID watermark.
Pros
- Free tier with daily top-up credits and the full core features
- Conversational editing through Gemini rather than prompt and reroll
- Google does not claim ownership of what you generate
- Music videos and cover art produced alongside the track
Cons
- Every output is embedded with Google's SynthID watermark
- Generation is metered by credits, and commercial rights are not stated on the pricing page
- Third name in four years, so the product keeps moving under you
- Cloud-only and tied to a Google account
| Plan | Price |
|---|---|
| Free | $0 |
| Starter | $8/mo ($6 annual) |
| Plus | $24/mo ($18 annual) |
| Member | $64/mo ($48 annual) |
ACE-Step
The open-source model behind much of local AI music
ACE-Step is an open-source music foundation model from ACE Studio and StepFun, and version 1.5 added an FSQ tokenizer along with remix, edit and cover tooling. It is free to download and run locally, and it is the engine underneath a number of consumer local apps, including parts of Song Creator Pro.
Coming from AIVA? Free, open source and runs on your own hardware, which removes both the subscription and the download counter in one step. You supply the Python and CUDA setup, and there is no support line when something breaks.
Pros
- Free and open source, with no licence fee at all
- Runs entirely on your own hardware
- Strong remix, edit and cover capabilities
Cons
- You have to set up Python 3.11 or 3.12, uv, GPU drivers and model weights yourself
- The bundled Gradio web UI is a developer tool rather than a polished app
- No support, and troubleshooting means reading GitHub issues
- Keeping up with model updates is manual work
| Plan | Price |
|---|---|
| Open source | Free |
MiniMax Music
Cheap per-song generation, aimed at developers
MiniMax Music is a model family from the AI lab MiniMax, with Music 2.5 released in January 2026 and Music 3.0 in July 2026. It was priced per generation rather than by subscription, but since 20 August 2026 the paid music API has been closed to new users and the free music APIs have been discontinued, so only existing API customers can still buy generations. The Music 3.0 weights are also published openly on Hugging Face for anyone able to run them locally. It is strongest on Mandarin and English, and is positioned more as a developer API than a consumer studio.
Coming from AIVA? Per-song billing at roughly $0.15 through the API instead of a monthly commitment, but only if you already have access: the paid music API has been closed to new users since 20 August 2026. MP3 only, no stems and no MIDI.
Pros
- Pay per generation with no subscription, for existing API customers
- Very cheap at roughly $0.15 a song through the official API
- 14 structural tags give paragraph-level control over song sections
- Selectable sample rates up to 48kHz and bitrates up to 320kbps
- Commercial rights included on all plans
Cons
- No stem export at all, so you only ever get the final mix
- No post-generation editing or section extension
- MP3 only, with no WAV or FLAC output
- Strongest on Mandarin and English, with less reliable pronunciation elsewhere
- Built around an API rather than a polished consumer interface
- Closed to new users: since 20 August 2026 the paid music API accepts existing customers only, and the free music APIs are gone
| Plan | Price |
|---|---|
| New users | Not available |
| API (existing users) | $0.15/song |
Round by round
Song Creator Pro vs AIVA
Six categories, each with a winner.
Orchestral and cinematic writing
Winner: AIVAAIVA has been doing this since 2016, longer than almost anything else in the category, and it was the first virtual composer registered with a rights society, SACEM. It is trained around classical and symphonic structure rather than retrofitted to it, and it shows in voice leading, instrumentation and the way sections actually develop instead of looping. With more than 250 style presets, custom style models and the option to upload an audio or MIDI influence, you can steer it toward a specific scoring brief with a precision that prompt-driven audio models do not offer. If you are writing a trailer cue or a strings bed, AIVA is the better instrument.
Handing the result to a DAW
Winner: AIVAAIVA exports MIDI, including on the free plan, which means what you generate arrives as notes rather than as a finished mixdown. You can swap the string library, rewrite a bar, change the key, quantise, and treat the AI output as a first draft rather than a final take. Song Creator Pro is not quite the blank wall this comparison usually paints: its YuE2 workflow plans each song as a symbolic score first, and you can edit that melody, those chords and the lyric mapping before rendering, which is closer to composing than prompting. What it does not do is hand you a MIDI file. Once the score renders you have audio, in MP3, FLAC or WAV, plus stems if you separate them. So the editing happens inside the app and before the render, not in Logic afterwards. For composers whose work ends in a DAW with a string library loaded, that handoff is decisive and AIVA owns it.
Songs with vocals
Winner: Song Creator ProAIVA has no vocal generation at all. Not a limited version, not a paid add-on: there is no lyrics input and no voice in the product. Song Creator Pro ships ACE-Step 1.5 and YuE2 and generates complete structured songs with synchronised vocals from lyrics you supply, in more than 50 languages. YuE2 is the first open model to outscore Suno on a public benchmark, averaging 6.96 on WildSongBench against Suno v5's 6.87 and v6's 6.56. If the brief involves a singer, this round is not close.
How many tracks you can actually take away
Winner: Song Creator ProAIVA meters exports. Free gives you 3 downloads a month with a 3 minute ceiling and an attribution requirement. Standard, at 11 euros a month billed annually, gives 15 downloads and 5 minutes. Only Pro reaches 300. That matters most during iteration, when you want to hear four variations in context rather than in a browser preview. Song Creator Pro generates and exports without any counter, in MP3, WAV or FLAC, and batch generation means you can queue variations and pick the one that works. The marginal cost of the hundredth track is the same as the first: nothing.
What full rights cost you
Winner: Song Creator ProCredit where it is due: AIVA's Pro tier assigns you the copyright outright and says that ownership persists for compositions you downloaded while subscribed. That is a clearer commitment than most platforms make. The price is 33 euros a month billed annually, about 396 euros a year and roughly 1,188 euros over three years, and on Free and Standard the copyright stays with AIVA while Standard's monetisation covers only YouTube, Twitch, TikTok and Instagram. Song Creator Pro includes a full commercial licence in a $49.99 one-time purchase. It does not assign copyright, and it is worth knowing that the US Copyright Office's position is that music with no human authorship is not copyrightable to anyone in the first place, so what any platform can transfer has limits. For the practical question of whether you may sell, sync and monetise what you made, one payment settles it permanently.
Privacy and working offline
Winner: Song Creator ProAIVA runs in the browser on AIVA's servers, behind an account, and anything you upload as an influence goes with it. That is normal for the category and fine for most work, less so for a scoring job under NDA or a client stem you were not given permission to redistribute. Song Creator Pro processes everything on your own GPU with no account and no network connection after installation, so nothing you write or upload leaves the machine. It also means the tool keeps working if the company does not: the model is on your disk, not behind someone's login.
The verdict
Conclusion
AIVA earns its reputation in a narrow place and holds it well. For orchestral, cinematic and classical writing it has a decade of focus behind it, it was the first AI composer recognised by a rights society, and its MIDI export makes it the only tool in this comparison whose output you can genuinely keep composing with. If your work ends in a DAW with a string library loaded, none of the prompt-to-audio generators replace it.
The problems are the edges of that focus. There are no vocals anywhere in the product, so a song with lyrics is simply out of scope. Exports are metered at 3 a month free and 15 on Standard, which is restrictive during the part of the process where you most want to iterate. And the copyright assignment that most people are actually shopping for sits on the Pro tier at 33 euros a month billed annually, roughly 396 euros a year, with AIVA retaining copyright on every plan below it.
Song Creator Pro answers a different set of those problems rather than all of them. It will not give you MIDI and it will not let you edit a note, and it is Windows only today with macOS on the roadmap. What it does give you is full songs with vocals in 50+ languages, unlimited generation and unlimited exports in MP3, WAV and FLAC, seed, guidance scale and inference step controls, four stem separation models, and a commercial licence, all for $49.99 once, running entirely on your own machine. If AIVA is your scoring tool, keep it. If AIVA was meant to be your song tool, it was never going to be.
Frequently Asked Questions
It depends on why you are leaving. For songs with vocals, unlimited downloads and a one-time price, Song Creator Pro runs locally on Windows for $49.99. For instrumental and cinematic work with a different model behind it, Stable Audio. For unlimited royalty-free downloads aimed at video, Soundraw. For the cleanest licensing provenance in the cloud, ElevenLabs Music. Nothing on this list replaces AIVA's MIDI export, so if that is what you rely on, the honest answer is to keep AIVA for scoring and add a second tool for songs.
There is a free forever plan, but it is tightly bounded. You get 3 downloads a month, tracks up to 3 minutes, MP3 and MIDI formats only, no monetisation of any kind, and you must credit AIVA. Copyright in anything you generate on the free plan remains with AIVA rather than with you.
As of September 2026, AIVA's Standard plan is 11 euros a month billed annually and includes 15 downloads a month, tracks up to 5 minutes, and limited monetisation on YouTube, Twitch, TikTok and Instagram. The Pro plan is 33 euros a month billed annually and includes 300 downloads a month, tracks up to 5 minutes 30 seconds, all file formats including high quality WAV, full monetisation and copyright ownership. AIVA advertises those as discounted annual rates of 26% and 33%, which puts the undiscounted monthly equivalents at roughly 15 and 49 euros.
Partly, and it depends on the plan. The free plan allows no monetisation and requires credit to AIVA. Standard allows limited monetisation restricted to YouTube, Twitch, TikTok and Instagram. Only the Pro plan gives full, unrestricted monetisation, and only Pro transfers copyright to you. If you need commercial rights for client work, advertising, games or film, Pro is the only AIVA tier that covers it.
No. AIVA is an instrumental composition tool. There is no lyrics input, no vocal model and no vocal stem on any plan. If you need a track with singing, you need a different tool: Song Creator Pro generates full songs with synchronised vocals from your lyrics in 50+ languages locally, and Suno, Mureka and ElevenLabs Music do it in the cloud.
On the Free and Standard plans, AIVA's pricing page states that copyright is owned by AIVA. On the Pro plan, copyright is owned by you, and AIVA describes that ownership as permanent for compositions downloaded while you were subscribed. Worth knowing separately: the US Copyright Office's position is that music generated without human authorship is not copyrightable at all, so an assignment from any platform can only transfer whatever rights exist in the first place. Human contributions such as written lyrics, arrangement and editing are what tend to be protectable.
Within the AI music generation category, not really. MIDI export is the feature AIVA is genuinely alone on among the mainstream tools, which is why composers who work in a DAW keep it. Audio-diffusion tools including Suno, Stable Audio and ElevenLabs Music all output rendered audio only. The closest alternative is score editing rather than MIDI export: Song Creator Pro runs YuE2, which plans each song as a symbolic score before it renders, and the app lets you revise that melody, the chords and the lyric mapping and regenerate from it. That gives you compositional control over the result, but it stays inside the app and produces audio, not a MIDI file you can open in Logic or Cubase. Stem separation gets you part of the way too, splitting a finished track into vocals, drums, bass and other parts, though stems are still audio rather than notes.
Yes. Song Creator Pro is a one-time purchase of $49.99 on the Microsoft Store or $44.99 on itch.io, with lifetime updates and unlimited generation. MiniMax Music charges existing API customers roughly $0.15 a song, but its paid music API has been closed to new users since 20 August 2026. ACE-Step and YuE2 are free and open source if you are comfortable setting up Python, CUDA and model weights yourself.
Three on the free plan, 15 on Standard and 300 on Pro, as of September 2026. The caps apply to exports rather than to generation, so you can keep composing in the browser after you hit the limit, you just cannot take the files away. Song Creator Pro applies no download limit because the audio renders directly to your own disk.
They do different jobs. AIVA is better at orchestral and cinematic composition and is the only one of the two that exports MIDI. Suno is better at anything with vocals, covers far more popular genres, and has a much larger community. Suno also has its own limits worth knowing about: it retired every model before v6 in September 2026 under its Warner settlement, and its paid plans cap downloads at 20 a month on Pro and 60 on Premier.
A GPU (NVIDIA or AMD) is recommended for the best speed, and Song Creator Pro is among the first apps to run YuE2 on 8 GB cards rather than the roughly 24 GB its official release expects. The app detects your hardware and suggests the optimal backend, and it supports CPU-only processing plus int8 quantization and CPU offloading for weaker machines. It works on modest hardware, just more slowly.
Keep comparing
See how Song Creator Pro compares with other tools
vs Suno
Learn morevs Udio
Learn morevs ElevenLabs Music
Learn morevs Mureka
Learn morevs MiniMax Music
Learn morevs Musci.io
Learn morevs Google Flow Music
Learn morevs Soundraw
Learn morevs Mubert
Learn morevs Boomy
Learn morevs Stable Audio
Learn morevs Tad AI
Learn morevs ACE Studio
Learn morevs Riffusion
Learn morevs Soundful
Learn morevs Beatoven.ai
Learn moreSong Creator Pro is more than just a AIVA alternative
Unlimited local generation, remixing and stem separation on your own GPU. One payment, lifetime updates, and nothing ever leaves your machine.
Get Song Creator ProFree trial on the Microsoft Store · One-time payment · No recurring fees